Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCooch, Evan G.  Concept link
dc.contributor.authorCam, Emmanuelle  Concept link
dc.contributor.authorCaswell, Hal  Concept link
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-14T20:44:28Z
dc.date.available2012-11-14T20:44:28Z
dc.date.issued2010-07
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1912/5548
dc.descriptionAuthor Posting. © The Author(s), 2010. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of Springer for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of Ornithology 152, Suppl.2 (2012):585-595, doi:10.1007/s10336-010-0573-1.en_US
dc.description.abstractAdvances in the estimation of population parameters using encounter data from marked individuals have made it possible to include estimates of the probability of recruitment in population projection models. However, the projected growth rate of the population, and the sensitivity of projected growth to changes in recruitment, can vary significantly depending upon both the structural form of the model and how recruitment is parameterized. We show that the common practices of (1) collapsing some age classes into a single, terminal ‘aggregated’ age-class, and (2) parameterizing recruitment using the proportion of recruited individuals (breeders) in a given age-class may confound analysis of age-based (Leslie) matrix projection models in some instances, relative to state-based projection models where recruited and pre-recruited individuals are treated as separate states. Failing to account for these differences can lead to misinterpretation of the relative role of recruitment in the dynamics of an age-structured population.We show that such problems can be avoided, either by structural changes to the terminal aggregated age-class in age-based models, or by using using a state-based model instead. Since all the metrics of general interest from a classical age-based matrix models are readily derived from a state-based model equivalent, this suggests there may be little reason to use the classical age-based approach in situations where recruitment is a parameter of interest.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-010-0573-1
dc.titleIncorporating ‘recruitment’ in matrix projection models : estimation, parameters, and the influence of model structureen_US
dc.typePreprinten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record