Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLiu, Q.  Concept link
dc.contributor.authorDai, Minhan  Concept link
dc.contributor.authorChen, W.  Concept link
dc.contributor.authorHuh, C.-A.  Concept link
dc.contributor.authorWang, Guihua  Concept link
dc.contributor.authorLi, Q.  Concept link
dc.contributor.authorCharette, Matthew A.  Concept link
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-01T15:48:29Z
dc.date.available2012-08-01T15:48:29Z
dc.date.issued2012-05-22
dc.identifier.citationBiogeosciences 9 (2012): 1777-1795en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1912/5286
dc.description© The Author(s), 2012. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Biogeosciences 9 (2012): 1777-1795, doi:10.5194/bg-9-1777-2012.en_US
dc.description.abstractIn order to assess the role of submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) and its impact on the carbonate system on the northern South China Sea (NSCS) shelf, we measured seawater concentrations of four radium isotopes 223,224,226,228Ra along with carbonate system parameters in June–July, 2008. Complementary groundwater sampling was conducted in coastal areas in December 2008 and October 2010 to constrain the groundwater end-members. The distribution of Ra isotopes in the NSCS was largely controlled by the Pearl River plume and coastal upwelling. Long-lived Ra isotopes (228Ra and 226Ra) were enriched in the river plume but low in the offshore surface water and subsurface water/upwelling zone. In contrast, short-lived Ra isotopes (224Ra and 223Ra) were elevated in the subsurface water/upwelling zone as well as in the river plume but depleted in the offshore surface water. In order to quantify SGD, we adopted two independent mathematical approaches. Using a three end-member mixing model with total alkalinity (TAlk) and Ra isotopes, we derived a SGD flux into the NSCS shelf of 2.3–3.7 × 108 m3 day−1. Our second approach involved a simple mass balance of 228Ra and 226Ra and resulted in a first order but consistent SGD flux estimate of 2.2–3.7 × 108 m3 day−1. These fluxes were equivalent to 12–21 % of the Pearl River discharge, but the source of the SGD was mostly recirculated seawater. Despite the relatively small SGD volume flow compared to the river, the associated material fluxes were substantial given their elevated concentrations of dissolved inorganic solutes. In this case, dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) flux through SGD was 153–347 × 109 mol yr−1, or ~23–53 % of the riverine DIC export flux. Our estimates of the groundwater-derived phosphate flux ranged 3–68 × 107 mol yr−1, which may be responsible for new production on the shelf up to 0.3–6.3 mmol C m−2 d−1. This rate of new production would at most consume 11 % of the DIC contribution delivered by SGD. Hence, SGD may play an important role in the carbon balance over the NSCS shelf.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was financially supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) through grant #2009CB421204 and #2009CB421201, and by the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) through grants #90711005, #41121091 and #41130857. Matthew Charette’s participation was supported by a grant from the U.S. National Science Foundation (#OCE-0751525).en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCopernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Unionen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-1777-2012
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 Unported*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/*
dc.titleHow significant is submarine groundwater discharge and its associated dissolved inorganic carbon in a river-dominated shelf system?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/bg-9-1777-2012


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 3.0 Unported
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 3.0 Unported