Bigger is not always better : offspring size does not predict growth or survival for seven ascidian species
Citable URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1912/4686As published
https://doi.org/10.1890/09-2072.1DOI
10.1890/09-2072.1Keyword
Ascidian; Growth rate; Offspring size; Size-quality tradeoff; Survival; TunicateAbstract
The presumed trade-off between offspring size and quality predicted by life history theory is often invoked to explain the wide range of propagule sizes observed in animals and plants. This trade-off is broadly supported by intraspecific studies but has been difficult to test in an interspecific context, particularly in animals. We tested the fitness consequences of offspring size both intra- and interspecifically for seven species of ascidians (sessile, suspension-feeding, marine invertebrates) whose offspring volumes varied over three orders of magnitude. We measured two major components of fitness, juvenile growth rates and survival, in laboratory and field experiments encompassing several food conditions. Contrary to the predictions of life history theory, larger offspring size did not result in higher rates of growth or survival, and large offspring did not perform better under nutritional stress, either intraspecifically or interspecifically. In fact, two of the four species with small offspring grew rapidly enough to catch up in size to the species with large offspring in as little as eight weeks, under wild-type food conditions. Trade-offs between growth potential and defense may overwhelm and obscure any trade-offs between offspring size and survival or growth rate. While large initial size may still confer a competitive advantage, we failed to detect any consequences of interspecific variation in initial size. This implies that larger offspring in these species, far from being inherently superior in growth or survival, require compensation in other aspects of life history if reproductive effort is to be efficient. Our results suggest that the importance of initial offspring size is context dependent and often overestimated relative to other life history traits.
Description
Author Posting. © Ecological Society of America, 2010. This article is posted here by permission of Ecological Society of America for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Ecology 91 (2010): 3598–3608, doi:10.1890/09-2072.1.
Collections
Suggested Citation
Ecology 91 (2010): 3598–3608Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Survival, length, and growth responses of M. menidia offspring from different females exposed to contrasting CO2 environments.
Baumann, Hannes; Nye, Janet (Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO). Contact: bco-dmo-data@whoi.edu, 2017-11-15)Wild-caught M. menidia adults were spawned to test whether offspring from different mothers differ in their average survival and size responses to elevated CO2 conditions. The experiment quantified three related survival ... -
Survival of northern sand lance Ammodytes dubius offspring under factorial CO2 x temperature conditions
Murray, Christopher S.; Wiley, David; Baumann, Hannes (Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO). Contact: bco-dmo-data@whoi.edu, 2019-09-23)Survival source data of 2016-2018 experimental work on the sensitivity of northern sand lance (A. dubius) offspring to combined ocean warming and acidification. For a complete list of measurements, refer to the full ... -
Survival of northern sand lance Ammodytes dubius offspring under factorial CO2 x temperature conditions
Murray, Christopher S.; Wiley, David; Baumann, Hannes (Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO). Contact: bco-dmo-data@whoi.edu, 2021-05-27)Survival source data of 2016-2018 experimental work on the sensitivity of northern sand lance (A. dubius) offspring to combined ocean warming and acidification. For a complete list of measurements, refer to the full ...