Impact assessment research : use and misuse of habituation, sensitisation and tolerance in describing wildlife responses to anthropogenic stimuli
MetadataShow full item record
KeywordHabituation; Sensitisation; Tolerance; Human disturbance; Wildlife management; Conservation; Impact assessment
Studies on the effects of anthropogenic activity on wildlife aim to provide a sound scientific basis for management. However, misinterpretation of the theoretical basis for these studies can jeopardise this objective and lead to management outcomes that are detrimental to the wildlife they are intended to protect. Misapplication of the terms ‘habituation’, ‘sensitisation’ and ‘tolerance’ in impact studies, for example, can lead to fundamental misinterpretations of research findings. Habituation is often used incorrectly to refer to any form of moderation in wildlife response to human disturbance, rather than to describe a progressive reduction in response to stimuli that are perceived as neither aversive nor beneficial. This misinterpretation, when coupled with the widely held assumption that habituation has a positive or neutral outcome for animals, can lead to inappropriate decisions about the threats human interactions pose to wildlife. We review the conceptual framework for the use of habituation, sensitisation and tolerance, and provide a set of principles for their appropriate application in studies of behavioural responses to anthropogenic stimuli. We describe how cases of presumed habituation or sensitisation may actually represent differences in the tolerance levels of wildlife to anthropogenic activity. This distinction is vital because impact studies must address (1) the various mechanisms by which differing tolerance levels can occur; and (2) the range of explanations for habituation- and sensitisation-type responses. We show that only one mechanism leads to true behavioural habituation (or sensitisation), while a range of mechanisms can lead to changes in tolerance.
Author Posting. © Inter-Research, 2009. This article is posted here by permission of Inter-Research for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Marine Ecology Progress Series 395 (2009): 177-185, doi:10.3354/meps07979.
Suggested CitationMarine Ecology Progress Series 395 (2009): 177-185
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Mean plot-level responses observed in an experiment conducted at Zeke's Island National Estuarine Research Reserve where abundance of the seaweed Gracilaria vermiculophylla was manipulated to assess impact on multiple ecosystem functions Silliman, Brian; Ramus, Aaron (Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO). Contact: firstname.lastname@example.org, 2019-08-02)These data represent the time-averaged value of each variable measured monthly in each plot over the course of a 10 month experiment carried out on intertidal mud and sandflats located within the Zeke’s Island National ...
Extrapolating cetacean densities to quantitatively assess human impacts on populations in the high seas Mannocci, Laura; Roberts, Jason J.; Miller, David L.; Halpin, Patrick N. (John Wiley & Sons, 2017-04-28)As human activities expand beyond national jurisdictions to the high seas, there is an increasing need to consider anthropogenic impacts to species inhabiting these waters. The current scarcity of scientific observations ...
Hurricane impacts on the Caribbean coastal/marine environment : using scientific assessment to plan for the future Aubrey, David G.; Giese, Graham S.; Burdick, D. M.; Agardy, M. T.; Haney, J. Christopher; Gable, F. J. (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 1991-09)The passage of Hurricane Hugo through the eastern Caribbean provided a unique opportunity for multidisciplinary study of (1) the effects of severe storms on tropical coastal and marine ecosystems, and (2) the physical and ...