Constraints on lithosphere net rotation and asthenospheric viscosity from global mantle flow models and seismic anisotropy
Citable URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1912/3890As published
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GC002970DOI
10.1029/2009GC002970Keyword
Net rotation; Lithsopheric drift; Seismic anisotropy; Asthenospheric shear; Plate motions; Global mantle flowAbstract
Although an average westward rotation of the Earth's lithosphere is indicated by global analyses of surface features tied to the deep mantle (e.g., hot spot tracks), the rate of lithospheric drift is uncertain despite its importance to global geodynamics. We use a global viscous flow model to predict asthenospheric anisotropy computed from linear combinations of mantle flow fields driven by relative plate motions, mantle density heterogeneity, and westward lithosphere rotation. By comparing predictions of lattice preferred orientation to asthenospheric anisotropy in oceanic regions inferred from SKS splitting observations and surface wave tomography, we constrain absolute upper mantle viscosity (to 0.5–1.0 × 1021 Pa s, consistent with other constraints) simultaneously with net rotation rate and the decrease in the viscosity of the asthenosphere relative to that of the upper mantle. For an asthenosphere 10 times less viscous than the upper mantle, we find that global net rotation must be <0.26°/Myr (<60% of net rotation in the HS3 (Pacific hot spot) reference frame); larger viscosity drops amplify asthenospheric shear associated with net rotation and thus require slower net rotation to fit observed anisotropy. The magnitude of westward net rotation is consistent with lithospheric drift relative to Indo-Atlantic hot spots but is slower than drift in the Pacific hot spot frame (HS3 ≈ 0.44°/Myr). The latter may instead express net rotation relative to the deep mantle beneath the Pacific plate, which is moving rapidly eastward in our models.
Description
Author Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2010. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems 11 (2010): Q05W05, doi:10.1029/2009GC002970.
Collections
Suggested Citation
Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems 11 (2010): Q05W05Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Global mantle flow and the development of seismic anisotropy : differences between the oceanic and continental upper mantle
Conrad, Clinton P.; Behn, Mark D.; Silver, Paul G. (American Geophysical Union, 2007-07-26)Viscous shear in the asthenosphere accommodates relative motion between Earth's surface plates and underlying mantle, generating lattice-preferred orientation (LPO) in olivine aggregates and a seismically anisotropic fabric. ... -
Upper mantle seismic anisotropy at a strike-slip boundary : South Island, New Zealand
Zietlow, Daniel W.; Sheehan, Anne F.; Molnar, Peter H.; Savage, Martha K.; Hirth, Greg; Collins, John A.; Hager, Bradford H. (John Wiley & Sons, 2014-02-05)New shear wave splitting measurements made from stations onshore and offshore the South Island of New Zealand show a zone of anisotropy 100–200 km wide. Measurements in central South Island and up to approximately 100 km ... -
Finite-frequency wave propagation through outer rise fault zones and seismic measurements of upper mantle hydration
Miller, Nathaniel C.; Lizarralde, Daniel (John Wiley & Sons, 2016-08-14)Effects of serpentine-filled fault zones on seismic wave propagation in the upper mantle at the outer rise of subduction zones are evaluated using acoustic wave propagation models. Modeled wave speeds depend on azimuth, ...