Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWard, Brian
dc.contributor.authorWanninkhof, Rik
dc.contributor.authorMcGillis, Wade R.
dc.contributor.authorJessup, Andrew T.
dc.contributor.authorDeGrandpre, Michael D.
dc.contributor.authorHare, Jeffrey E.
dc.contributor.authorEdson, James B.
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-19T15:58:13Z
dc.date.available2010-07-19T15:58:13Z
dc.date.issued2004-06-30
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Geophysical Research 109 (2004): C08S08en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1912/3757
dc.descriptionAuthor Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2004. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of Geophysical Research 109 (2004): C08S08, doi:10.1029/2003JC001800.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe difference in the fugacities of CO2 across the diffusive sublayer at the ocean surface is the driving force behind the air-sea flux of CO2. Bulk seawater fugacity is normally measured several meters below the surface, while the fugacity at the water surface, assumed to be in equilibrium with the atmosphere, is measured several meters above the surface. Implied in these measurements is that the fugacity values are the same as those across the diffusive boundary layer. However, temperature gradients exist at the interface due to molecular transfer processes, resulting in a cool surface temperature, known as the skin effect. A warm layer from solar radiation can also result in a heterogeneous temperature profile within the upper few meters of the ocean. Here we describe measurements carried out during a 14-day study in the equatorial Pacific Ocean (GasEx-2001) aimed at estimating the gradients of CO2 near the surface and resulting flux anomalies. The fugacity measurements were corrected for temperature effects using data from the ship's thermosalinograph, a high-resolution profiler (SkinDeEP), an infrared radiometer (CIRIMS), and several point measurements at different depths on various platforms. Results from SkinDeEP show that the largest cool skin and warm layer biases occur at low winds, with maximum biases of −4% and +4%, respectively. Time series ship data show an average CO2 flux cool skin retardation of about 2%. Ship and drifter data show significant CO2 flux enhancement due to the warm layer, with maximums occurring in the afternoon. Temperature measurements were compared to predictions based on available cool skin parameterizations to predict the skin-bulk temperature difference, along with a warm layer model.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis material is based upon work supported by the NSF under grant OCE-9986724, and by NOAA/OGP grant GC00-226.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Unionen_US
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JC001800
dc.subjectAir-sea CO2 fluxen_US
dc.subjectWarm layeren_US
dc.subjectCool skinen_US
dc.titleBiases in the air-sea flux of CO2 resulting from ocean surface temperature gradientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1029/2003JC001800


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record