Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTwichell, David C.
dc.contributor.authorCross, VeeAnn A.
dc.contributor.authorPeterson, Curt D.
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-07T17:44:43Z
dc.date.available2010-07-07T17:44:43Z
dc.date.issued2010-02-11
dc.identifier.citationMarine Geology 273 (2010): 11-31en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1912/3726
dc.descriptionThis paper is not subject to U.S. copyright. The definitive version was published in Marine Geology 273 (2010): 11-31, doi:10.1016/j.margeo.2010.02.001.en_US
dc.description.abstractSediment derived from the Columbia River has been deposited on the continental shelf, along the barriers and beaches, and in the bays of the Oregon and Washington coast during the Holocene. The barrier and beach deposits of this 150-km section of coast comprise approximately 6 km3 of these Holocene sediments (Peterson et al., 2010-this issue) while the fluvial and bay deposits comprise about 104 km3 (Baker et al., 2010-this issue), and the shelf deposit is approximately 79 km3. Seismic-reflection, sidescan sonar, and surface sediment data show that the shelf deposit is not uniform in distribution or composition. The shelf deposit is 15–50 m thick off the beaches of the southern part of the study area but is less than 3 m thick, and, in places, absent from the inner shelf in the northern third of the study area. Surface sediment texture of the shelf deposit varies as well. Pleistocene-age gravel covers parts of the inner shelf in the northern third of the area. To the south, the surface of the Holocene shelf deposit is composed of fine sand near shore that grades offshore to dominantly very fine sand in 25–30 m water depth and muddy sand on the middle and outer shelf (> 50 m depth). Although a huge volume of sediment covers the shelf, its uneven distribution indicates that in places only small amounts are available as a potential offshore source to the adjacent beaches, and in other places the finer-grained nature of the shelf deposit indicates that significant winnowing of fine sediment would be necessary to make it compositionally equivalent to sediment on adjacent beaches.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.en_US
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2010.02.001
dc.subjectContinental shelfen_US
dc.subjectHolocene sedimentsen_US
dc.subjectColumbia Riveren_US
dc.titlePartitioning of sediment on the shelf offshore of the Columbia River littoral cellen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.margeo.2010.02.001


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record