Comparative proteome analysis of psychrophilic versus mesophilic bacterial species : insights into the molecular basis of cold adaptation of proteins
Additional file 1: T-test values for amino acid substitution preferences between proteins of Mesophilic and Psychrophilic proteomes. (17.34Kb)
MetadataShow full item record
Cold adapted or psychrophilic organisms grow at low temperatures, where most of other organisms cannot grow. This adaptation requires a vast array of sequence, structural and physiological adjustments. To understand the molecular basis of cold adaptation of proteins, we analyzed proteomes of psychrophilic and mesophilic bacterial species and compared the differences in amino acid composition and substitution patterns to investigate their likely association with growth temperatures. In psychrophilic bacteria, serine, aspartic acid, threonine and alanine are overrepresented in the coil regions of secondary structures, whilst glutamic acid and leucine are underrepresented in the helical regions. Compared to mesophiles, psychrophiles comprise a significantly higher proportion of amino acids that contribute to higher protein flexibility in the coil regions of proteins, such as those with tiny/small or neutral side chains. Amino acids with aliphatic, basic, aromatic and hydrophilic side chains are underrepresented in the helical regions of proteins of psychrophiles. The patterns of amino acid substitutions between the orthologous proteins of psychrophiles versus mesophiles are significantly different for several amino acids when compared to their substitutions in orthologous proteins of within the mesophiles or psychrophiles. Current results provide quantitative substitution preferences (or avoidance) of amino acids that lead to the adaptation of proteins to cold temperatures. These finding would help future efforts in selecting mutations for rational design of proteins with enhanced psychrophilic properties.
© 2009 The Authors. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in BMC Genomics 10 (2009): 11, doi:10.1186/1471-2164-10-11.
Suggested CitationBMC Genomics 10 (2009): 11
The following license files are associated with this item: