The future of coastal and estuarine modeling: findings from a workshop
Fringer, Oliver B.
Dawson, Clint N.
Ralston, David K.
Zhang, Y. Joseph
MetadataShow full item record
KeywordCoastal ocean modeling; Physical processes; Model subjectivity; Development of standards; High-resolution modeling; Parameter estimation
This paper summarizes the findings of a workshop convened in the United States in 2018 to discuss methods in coastal and estuarine modeling and to propose key areas of research and development needed to improve their accuracy and reliability. The focus of this paper is on physical processes, and we provide an overview of the current state-of-the-art based on presentations and discussions at the meeting, which revolved around the four primary themes of parameterizations, numerical methods, in-situ and remote-sensing measurements, and high-performance computing. A primary outcome of the workshop was agreement on the need to reduce subjectivity and improve reproducibility in modeling of physical processes in the coastal ocean. Reduction of subjectivity can be accomplished through development of standards for benchmarks, grid generation, and validation, and reproducibility can be improved through development of standards for input/output, coupling and model nesting, and reporting. Subjectivity can also be reduced through more engagement with the applied mathematics and computer science communities to develop methods for robust parameter estimation and uncertainty quantification. Such engagement could be encouraged through more collaboration between the forward and inverse modeling communities and integration of more applied math and computer science into oceanography curricula. Another outcome of the workshop was agreement on the need to develop high-resolution models that scale on advanced HPC systems to resolve, rather than parameterize, processes with horizontal scales that range between the depth and the internal Rossby deformation scale. Unsurprisingly, more research is needed on parameterizations of processes at scales smaller than the depth, including parameterizations for drag (including bottom roughness, bedforms, vegetation and corals), wave breaking, and air–sea interactions under strong wind conditions. Other topics that require significantly more work to better parameterize include nearshore wave modeling, sediment transport modeling, and morphodynamics. Finally, it was agreed that coastal models should be considered as key infrastructure needed to support research, just like laboratory facilities, field instrumentation, and research vessels. This will require a shift in the way proposals related to coastal ocean modeling are reviewed and funded.
© The Author(s), 2019. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Fringer, O. B., Dawson, C. N., He, R., Ralston, D. K., & Zhang, Y. J. The future of coastal and estuarine modeling: findings from a workshop. Ocean Modelling, 143, (2019): 101458, doi:10.1016/j.ocemod.2019.101458.
Suggested CitationFringer, O. B., Dawson, C. N., He, R., Ralston, D. K., & Zhang, Y. J. (2019). The future of coastal and estuarine modeling: findings from a workshop. Ocean Modelling, 143, 101458.
The following license files are associated with this item:
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
U.S. IOOS coastal and ocean modeling testbed : inter-model evaluation of tides, waves, and hurricane surge in the Gulf of Mexico Kerr, Patrick C.; Donahue, Aaron S.; Westerink, Joannes J.; Luettich, Richard A.; Zheng, L. Y.; Weisberg, Robert H.; Huang, Y.; Wang, H. V.; Teng, Y.; Forrest, D. R.; Roland, Aron; Haase, A. T.; Kramer, A. W.; Taylor, A. A.; Rhome, J. R.; Feyen, J. C.; Signell, Richard P.; Hanson, J. L.; Hope, M. E.; Estes, R. M.; Dominguez, R. A.; Dunbar, R. P.; Semeraro, L. N.; Westerink, H. J.; Kennedy, A. B.; Smith, J. M.; Powell, M. D.; Cardone, V. J.; Cox, A. T. (John Wiley & Sons, 2013-10-08)A Gulf of Mexico performance evaluation and comparison of coastal circulation and wave models was executed through harmonic analyses of tidal simulations, hindcasts of Hurricane Ike (2008) and Rita (2005), and a benchmarking ...
He, Ruoying; Liu, Yonggang; Weisberg, Robert H. (American Geophysical Union, 2004-07-17)Atmosphere model-derived flux fields are used to force coastal ocean models. Coarse resolution and incomplete boundary layer dynamics limit the accuracy of these forcing fields and hence the performance of the ocean models. ...
A model for uranium, rhenium, and molybdenum diagenesis in marine sediments based on results from coastal locations Morford, Jennifer L.; Martin, William R.; Francois, Roger; Carney, Caitlin M. (2008-12-31)The purpose of this research is to characterize the mobilization and immobilization processes that control the authigenic accumulation of uranium (U), rhenium (Re) and molybdenum (Mo) in marine sediments. We analyzed ...