Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCraddock, Paul R.  Concept link
dc.contributor.authorRouxel, Olivier J.  Concept link
dc.contributor.authorBall, Lary A.  Concept link
dc.contributor.authorBach, Wolfgang  Concept link
dc.date.accessioned2008-09-29T13:13:08Z
dc.date.available2008-09-29T13:13:08Z
dc.date.issued2008-04
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1912/2427
dc.descriptionAuthor Posting. © Elsevier B.V. , 2008. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of Elsevier B.V. for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Chemical Geology 253 (2008): 102-113, doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.04.017.en
dc.description.abstractWe have developed a technique for the accurate and precise determination of 34S/32S isotope ratios (δ34S) in sulfur-bearing minerals using solution and laser ablation multiple-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (MC-ICP-MS). We have examined and determined rigorous corrections for analytical difficulties such as instrumental mass bias, unresolved isobaric interferences, blanks, and laser ablation- and matrix-induced isotopic fractionation. Use of high resolution sector-field mass spectrometry removes major isobaric interferences from O2+. Standard–sample bracketing is used to correct for the instrumental mass bias of unknown samples. Blanks on sulfur masses arising from memory effects and residual oxygen-tailing are typically minor (< 0.2‰, within analytical error), and are mathematically removed by on-peak zero subtraction and by bracketing of samples with standards determined at the same signal intensity (within 20%). Matrix effects are significant (up to 0.7‰) for matrix compositions relevant to many natural sulfur-bearing minerals. For solution analysis, sulfur isotope compositions are best determined using purified (matrix-clean) sulfur standards and sample solutions using the chemical purification protocol we present. For in situ analysis, where the complex matrix cannot be removed prior to analysis, appropriately matrix-matching standards and samples removes matrix artifacts and yields sulfur isotope ratios consistent with conventional techniques using matrix-clean analytes. Our method enables solid samples to be calibrated against aqueous standards; a consideration that is important when certified, isotopically-homogeneous and appropriately matrix-matched solid standards do not exist. Further, bulk and in situ analyses can be performed interchangeably in a single analytical session because the instrumental setup is identical for both. We validated the robustness of our analytical method through multiple isotope analyses of a range of reference materials and have compared these with isotope ratios determined using independent techniques. Long-term reproducibility of S isotope compositions is typically 0.20‰ and 0.45‰ (2σ) for solution and laser analysis, respectively. Our method affords the opportunity to make accurate and relatively precise S isotope measurement for a wide range of sulfur-bearing materials, and is particularly appropriate for geologic samples with complex matrix and for which high-resolution in situ analysis is critical.en
dc.description.sponsorshipSupport was provided by National Science Foundations grants OCE-0327448 to P.R.C. and W.B. and OCE-0622982 to O.J.R. Support for L.A.B. was provided by the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Plasma Facility Development Grant (NSF-EAR/IF-0318137).en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.04.017
dc.subjectSulfuren
dc.subjectIsotope compositionen
dc.subjectICPen
dc.subjectMass spectrometryen
dc.subjectLaser ablationen
dc.titleSulfur isotope measurement of sulfate and sulfide by high-resolution MC-ICP-MSen
dc.typePreprinten


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record