Travel-time perturbations due to internal waves : equivalence of modal and ray solutions
Travel-time perturbations due to internal waves : equivalence of modal and ray solutions
Date
1996-02
Authors
Traykovski, Peter A.
Linked Authors
Person
publication.page.title.alternative
Citable URI
As Published
Date Created
Location
DOI
10.1121/1.414563
Replaced By
Keywords
Internal waves
Oceanography
Sound waves
Travelling waves
Underwater
Wave propagation
Barents Sea
Ray trajectories
Shallow–water equations
Travel time
Oceanography
Sound waves
Travelling waves
Underwater
Wave propagation
Barents Sea
Ray trajectories
Shallow–water equations
Travel time
Abstract
In a recent paper, Lynch et al. used modal and ray based perturbation techniques to compare predicted variances of acoustic travel times due to internal waves to measured variances in the Barents Sea Polar Front experiment [Lynch et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 803–821 (1996)]. One of the interesting results of this work is that the modal and ray travel-time variances are substantially different for rays and modes with the same grazing angle. Specifically, the maximum modal travel-time variance shows a resonant effect in which the variance increases with increasing frequency. Unlike the modal solution, the ray travel-time variance has a geometrically constrained maximum, independent of frequency. In this paper, the linear first-order solutions for the ray and modal variances due to the internal waves are reviewed, and in an Appendix the effects of the linearizing assumptions are examined. The ray and mode solutions are then shown to be consistent by considering a truncated sum of modes that constructively interfere along a geometric ray path. By defining the travel-time perturbation due to a truncated sum of modes, the travel-time variance of the modal sum is derived. With increasing frequency the maximum value of this variance converges to a frequency-independent result with a similar magnitude to the ray maximum variance.
Description
Author Posting. © Acoustical Society of America, 1996. This article is posted here by permission of Acoustical Society of America for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99 (1996): 822-830, doi:10.1121/1.414563.
Embargo Date
Citation
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99 (1996): 822-830