Topography and biological noise determine acoustic detectability on coral reefs

dc.contributor.author Cagua, E. Fernando
dc.contributor.author Berumen, Michael L.
dc.contributor.author Tyler, E. H. M.
dc.date.accessioned 2013-12-30T15:12:13Z
dc.date.available 2014-10-22T08:57:20Z
dc.date.issued 2013-07
dc.description Author Posting. © The Author(s), 2013. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of Springer for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Coral Reefs 32 (2013): 1123-1134, doi:10.1007/s00338-013-1069-2. en_US
dc.description.abstract Acoustic telemetry is an increasingly common tool for studying the movement patterns, behaviour, and site fidelity of marine organisms, but to accurately interpret acoustic data, the variability, periodicity and range of detectability between acoustic tags and receivers must be understood. The relative and interactive effects of topography with biological and environmental noise have not been quantified on coral reefs. We conduct two long-term range tests (one and four months duration) on two different reef types in the central Red Sea, to determine the relative effect of distance, depth, topography, time of day, wind, lunar phase, sea surface temperature and thermocline on detection probability. Detectability, as expected, declines with increasing distance between tags and receivers, and we find average detection ranges of 530 and 120 m, using V16 and V13 tags respectively, but the topography of the reef can significantly modify this relationship, reducing the range by ~70%, even when tags and receivers are in line-of-sight. Analyses that assume a relationship between distance and detections must therefore be used with care. Nighttime detection range was consistently reduced in both locations and detections varied by lunar phase in the four month test, suggesting a strong influence of biological noise (reducing detection probability up to 30%), notably more influential than other environmental noises, including wind-driven noise, which is normally considered important in open-water environments. Analysis of detections should be corrected in consideration of the diel patterns we find, and range tests or sentinel tags should be used for more than one month to quantify potential changes due to lunar phase. Some studies assume that the most usual factor limiting detection range is weather-related noise; this cannot be extrapolated to coral reefs. en_US
dc.description.embargo 2014-08-19 en_US
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/1912/6356
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.relation.uri https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-013-1069-2
dc.subject Passive monitoring en_US
dc.subject Acoustic transmitters en_US
dc.subject Detection efficiency en_US
dc.subject Saudi Arabia en_US
dc.title Topography and biological noise determine acoustic detectability on coral reefs en_US
dc.type Preprint en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 32869999-7860-4814-a2ac-6d606692cd9c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 0972f034-c19d-4e16-8b89-78ef826ab50c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 15b497c0-ae81-4ccd-b377-4da85f3f1a02
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 32869999-7860-4814-a2ac-6d606692cd9c
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Manuscript - Cagua et al - Acoustic detectability.pdf
Size:
1.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Author's manuscript
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Electronic supplementary material - Cagua et al - Acoustic detectability.pdf
Size:
66.1 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supplementary material
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.89 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections