Surface irradiances consistent with CERES-derived top-of-atmosphere shortwave and longwave irradiances
Surface irradiances consistent with CERES-derived top-of-atmosphere shortwave and longwave irradiances
Date
2013-05-01
Authors
Kato, Seiji
Loeb, Norman G.
Rose, Fred G.
Doelling, David R.
Rutan, David A.
Caldwell, Thomas E.
Yu, Lisan
Weller, Robert A.
Loeb, Norman G.
Rose, Fred G.
Doelling, David R.
Rutan, David A.
Caldwell, Thomas E.
Yu, Lisan
Weller, Robert A.
Linked Authors
Person
Person
Person
Person
Person
Alternative Title
Citable URI
As Published
Date Created
Location
DOI
10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00436.1
Related Materials
Replaces
Replaced By
Keywords
Energy budget/balance
Radiation budgets
Radiative fluxes
Radiative transfer
Radiation budgets
Radiative fluxes
Radiative transfer
Abstract
The estimate of surface irradiance on a global scale is possible through radiative transfer calculations using satellite-retrieved surface, cloud, and aerosol properties as input. Computed top-of-atmosphere (TOA) irradiances, however, do not necessarily agree with observation-based values, for example, from the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES). This paper presents a method to determine surface irradiances using observational constraints of TOA irradiance from CERES. A Lagrange multiplier procedure is used to objectively adjust inputs based on their uncertainties such that the computed TOA irradiance is consistent with CERES-derived irradiance to within the uncertainty. These input adjustments are then used to determine surface irradiance adjustments. Observations by the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS), Cloud–Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO), CloudSat, and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) that are a part of the NASA A-Train constellation provide the uncertainty estimates. A comparison with surface observations from a number of sites shows that the bias [root-mean-square (RMS) difference] between computed and observed monthly mean irradiances calculated with 10 years of data is 4.7 (13.3) W m−2 for downward shortwave and −2.5 (7.1) W m−2 for downward longwave irradiances over ocean and −1.7 (7.8) W m−2 for downward shortwave and −1.0 (7.6) W m−2 for downward longwave irradiances over land. The bias and RMS error for the downward longwave and shortwave irradiances over ocean are decreased from those without constraint. Similarly, the bias and RMS error for downward longwave over land improves, although the constraint does not improve downward shortwave over land. This study demonstrates how synergetic use of multiple instruments (CERES, MODIS, CALIPSO, CloudSat, AIRS, and geostationary satellites) improves the accuracy of surface irradiance computations.
Description
Author Posting. © American Meteorological Society, 2013. This article is posted here by permission of American Meteorological Society for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of Climate 26 (2013): 2719–2740, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00436.1.
Embargo Date
Citation
Journal of Climate 26 (2013): 2719–2740