The pumice raft-forming 2012 Havre submarine eruption was effusive
The pumice raft-forming 2012 Havre submarine eruption was effusive
Date
2018-02-14
Authors
Manga, Michael
Fauria, Kristen
Lin, Christina
Mitchell, Samuel J.
Jones, Meghan
Conway, Chris E.
Degruyter, Wim
Hosseini, Behnaz
Carey, Rebecca
Cahalan, Ryan
Houghton, Bruce
White, James D. L.
Jutzeler, Martin
Soule, Samuel A.
Tani, Kenichiro
Fauria, Kristen
Lin, Christina
Mitchell, Samuel J.
Jones, Meghan
Conway, Chris E.
Degruyter, Wim
Hosseini, Behnaz
Carey, Rebecca
Cahalan, Ryan
Houghton, Bruce
White, James D. L.
Jutzeler, Martin
Soule, Samuel A.
Tani, Kenichiro
Linked Authors
Person
Person
Person
Person
Person
Alternative Title
Citable URI
As Published
Date Created
Location
DOI
Replaced By
Keywords
Submarine eruption
Pumice
Fragmentation
Raft
Conduit flow
Xray tomography
Pumice
Fragmentation
Raft
Conduit flow
Xray tomography
Abstract
A long-standing conceptual model for deep submarine eruptions is that high hydrostatic pressure
hinders degassing and acceleration, and suppresses magma fragmentation. The 2012 submarine
rhyolite eruption of Havre volcano in the Kermadec arc provided constraints on critical
parameters to quantitatively test these concepts. This eruption produced a > 1 km3 raft of floating
pumice and a 0.1 km3 field of giant (>1 m) pumice clasts distributed down-current from the vent.
We address the mechanism of creating these clasts using a model for magma ascent in a conduit.
We use water ingestion experiments to address why some clasts float and others sink. We show
that at the eruption depth of 900 m, the melt retained enough dissolved water, and hence had a
low enough viscosity, that strain-rates were too low to cause brittle fragmentation in the conduit,
despite mass discharge rates similar to Plinian eruptions on land. There was still, however,
enough exsolved vapor at the vent depth to make the magma buoyant relative to seawater.
Buoyant magma was thus extruded into the ocean where it rose, quenched, and fragmented to
produce clasts up to several meters in diameter. We show that these large clasts would have
floated to the sea surface within minutes, where air could enter pore space, and the fate of clasts
is then controlled by the ability to trap gas within their pore space. We show that clasts from the
raft retain enough gas to remain afloat whereas fragments from giant pumice collected from the
seafloor ingest more water and sink. The pumice raft and the giant pumice seafloor deposit were
thus produced during a clast-generating effusive submarine eruption, where fragmentation
occurred above the vent, and the subsequent fate of clasts was controlled by their ability to ingest
water.
Description
Author Posting. © The Author(s), 2018. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here under a nonexclusive, irrevocable, paid-up, worldwide license granted to WHOI. It is made available for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Earth and Planetary Science Letters 489 (2018): 49-58, doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2018.02.025.