Five reasons to take the precautionary approach to deep sea exploitation
Five reasons to take the precautionary approach to deep sea exploitation
Date
2023-05-05
Authors
Bisson, Kelsey
McMonagle, Helena
Iglesias, Ilysa
Halfter, Svenja
Gallo, Natalya
McMonagle, Helena
Iglesias, Ilysa
Halfter, Svenja
Gallo, Natalya
Linked Authors
Alternative Title
Citable URI
As Published
Date Created
Location
DOI
10.1038/s43247-023-00823-4
Related Materials
Replaces
Replaced By
Keywords
Abstract
Extractive activities in the deep sea are poised to advance faster than the science needed to evaluate risks. Here, we call for a strong precautionary approach in developing these industries.
Food and energy insecurity have been exacerbated by climate change, conflict, and disease, with global energy demands only expected to grow. Seabed mining and deep-sea fishing have been suggested as ways to support shifting to renewable energy and increasing food supply. These industries are likely to impact one of the largest habitats on Earth, our ocean’s mesopelagic zone, at depths between ~200 and 1000 m. Once assumed to be lifeless, we now know the mesopelagic zone is rich with life and a vital component of the global ecosystem. Recently, industries have begun exploratory extractive activities, while our scientific understanding of the impacts of these activities on the mesopelagic zone is trailing behind (Fig. 1). Here, we outline five reasons why we advocate for a precautionary approach to deep-sea exploitation in order to make evidence-based decisions.
Description
© The Author(s), 2023. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Bisson, K., McMonagle, H., Iglesias, I., Halfter, S., & Gallo, N. Five reasons to take the precautionary approach to deep sea exploitation. Communications Earth & Environment, 4(1), (2023): 152, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00823-4.
Embargo Date
Citation
Bisson, K., McMonagle, H., Iglesias, I., Halfter, S., & Gallo, N. (2023). Five reasons to take the precautionary approach to deep sea exploitation. Communications Earth & Environment, 4(1), 152.