Threat management priorities for conserving Antarctic biodiversity

Thumbnail Image
Date
2022-12-22
Authors
Lee, Jasmine R.
Terauds, Aleks
Carwardine, Josie
Shaw, Justine D.
Fuller, Richard A.
Possingham, Hugh P.
Chown, Steven L.
Convey, Peter
Gilbert, Neil
Hughes, Kevin A.
McIvor, Ewan
Robinson, Sharon A.
Ropert-Coudert, Yan
Bergstrom, Dana M.
Biersma, Elisabeth M.
Christian, Claire
Cowan, Don A.
Frenot, Yves
Jenouvrier, Stéphanie
Kelley, Lisa
Lee, Michael J.
Lynch, Heather J.
Njåstad, Birgit
Quesada, Antonio
Roura, Ricardo M.
Shaw, E Ashley
Stanwell-Smith, Damon
Tsujimoto, Megumu
Wall, Diana H.
Wilmotte, Annick
Chadès, Iadine
Linked Authors
Alternative Title
Date Created
Location
DOI
10.1371/journal.pbio.3001921
Related Materials
Replaces
Replaced By
Keywords
Abstract
Antarctic terrestrial biodiversity faces multiple threats, from invasive species to climate change. Yet no large-scale assessments of threat management strategies exist. Applying a structured participatory approach, we demonstrate that existing conservation efforts are insufficient in a changing world, estimating that 65% (at best 37%, at worst 97%) of native terrestrial taxa and land-associated seabirds are likely to decline by 2100 under current trajectories. Emperor penguins are identified as the most vulnerable taxon, followed by other seabirds and dry soil nematodes. We find that implementing 10 key threat management strategies in parallel, at an estimated present-day equivalent annual cost of US$23 million, could benefit up to 84% of Antarctic taxa. Climate change is identified as the most pervasive threat to Antarctic biodiversity and influencing global policy to effectively limit climate change is the most beneficial conservation strategy. However, minimising impacts of human activities and improved planning and management of new infrastructure projects are cost-effective and will help to minimise regional threats. Simultaneous global and regional efforts are critical to secure Antarctic biodiversity for future generations.
Description
© The Author(s), 2022. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Lee, J., Terauds, A., Carwardine, J., Shaw, J., Fuller, R., Possingham, H., Chown, S., Convey, P., Gilbert, N., Hughes, K., McIvor, E., Robinson, S., Ropert-Coudert, Y., Bergstrom, D., Biersma, E., Christian, C., Cowan, D., Frenot, Y., Jenouvrier, S., Kelley, L., Lee, M. J., Lynch, H. J., Njåstad, B., Quesada, A., Roura, R. M., Shaw, E. A., Stanwell-Smith, D., Tsujimoto, M., Wall, D. H., Wilmotte, A., & Chadès, I. Threat management priorities for conserving Antarctic biodiversity. PLOS Biology, 20(12), (2022): e3001921, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001921.
Embargo Date
Citation
Lee, J., Terauds, A., Carwardine, J., Shaw, J., Fuller, R., Possingham, H., Chown, S., Convey, P., Gilbert, N., Hughes, K., McIvor, E., Robinson, S., Ropert-Coudert, Y., Bergstrom, D., Biersma, E., Christian, C., Cowan, D., Frenot, Y., Jenouvrier, S., Kelley, L., Lee, M. J., Lynch, H. J., Njåstad, B., Quesada, A., Roura, R. M., Shaw, E. A., Stanwell-Smith, D., Tsujimoto, M., Wall, D. H., Wilmotte, A., & Chadès, I. (2022). Threat management priorities for conserving Antarctic biodiversity. PLOS Biology, 20(12), e3001921.
Cruises
Cruise ID
Cruise DOI
Vessel Name
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International