Defining planktonic protist functional groups on mechanisms for energy and nutrient acquisition : incorporation of diverse mixotrophic strategies
Flynn, Kevin J.
Raven, John A.
Caron, David A.
Stoecker, Diane K.
Hansen, Per J.
Hallegraeff, Gustaaf M.
Sanders, Robert W.
Johnson, Matthew D.
Jeong, Hae Jin
Burkholder, JoAnn M.
Glibert, Patricia M.
MetadataShow full item record
KeywordPlankton functional types (PFTs); Phagotroph; Phototroph; Mixotroph; Phytoplankton; Microzooplankton
Arranging organisms into functional groups aids ecological research by grouping organisms (irrespective of phylogenetic origin) that interact with environmental factors in similar ways. Planktonic protists traditionally have been split between photoautotrophic “phytoplankton” and phagotrophic “microzooplankton”. However, there is a growing recognition of the importance of mixotrophy in euphotic aquatic systems, where many protists often combine photoautotrophic and phagotrophic modes of nutrition. Such organisms do not align with the traditional dichotomy of phytoplankton and microzooplankton. To reflect this understanding, we propose a new functional grouping of planktonic protists in an eco-physiological context: (i) phagoheterotrophs lacking phototrophic capacity, (ii) photoautotrophs lacking phagotrophic capacity, (iii) constitutive mixotrophs (CMs) as phagotrophs with an inherent capacity for phototrophy, and (iv) non-constitutive mixotrophs (NCMs) that acquire their phototrophic capacity by ingesting specific (SNCM) or general non-specific (GNCM) prey. For the first time, we incorporate these functional groups within a foodweb structure and show, using model outputs, that there is scope for significant changes in trophic dynamics depending on the protist functional type description. Accordingly, to better reflect the role of mixotrophy, we recommend that as important tools for explanatory and predictive research, aquatic food-web and biogeochemical models need to redefine the protist groups within their frameworks.
© The Author(s), 2016. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Protist 167 (2016): 106–120, doi:10.1016/j.protis.2016.01.003.
The following license files are associated with this item:
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Hashioka, Taketo; Vogt, Meike; Yamanaka, Yasuhiro; Le Quere, Corinne; Buitenhuis, Erik T.; Aita, M. N.; Alvain, S.; Bopp, Laurent; Hirata, T.; Lima, Ivan D.; Sailley, Sevrine F.; Doney, Scott C. (Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union, 2013-11-02)We investigated the mechanisms of phytoplankton competition during the spring bloom, one of the most dramatic seasonal events in lower-trophic-level ecosystems, in four state-of-the-art plankton functional type (PFT) models: ...
Sutherland, Kelly R. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 2010-02)Trade-offs between filtration rate and swimming performance among several salp species with distinct morphologies and swimming styles were compared. Small-scale particle encounter at the salp filtering apparatus was also ...
Benfield, Mark C.; Grosjean, Philippe; Culverhouse, Phil F.; Irigoien, Xabier; Sieracki, Michael E.; Lopez-Urrutia, Angel; Dam, Hans G.; Hu, Qiao; Davis, Cabell S.; Hansen, Allen; Pilskaln, Cynthia H.; Riseman, Edward M.; Schultz, Howard; Utgoff, Paul E.; Gorsky, Gabriel (Oceanography Society, 2007-06)When Victor Hensen deployed the first true plankton1 net in 1887, he and his colleagues were attempting to answer three fundamental questions: What planktonic organisms are present in the ocean? How many of each type ...