Bipolarization and poleward flux correlate during xenopus extract spindle assembly
Bipolarization and poleward flux correlate during xenopus extract spindle assembly
Date
2004-09-22
Authors
Mitchison, Timothy J.
Maddox, P.
Groen, Aaron C.
Cameron, Lisa
Perlman, Z.
Ohi, Ryoma
Desai, Ankur R.
Salmon, Edward D.
Kapoor, Tarun M.
Maddox, P.
Groen, Aaron C.
Cameron, Lisa
Perlman, Z.
Ohi, Ryoma
Desai, Ankur R.
Salmon, Edward D.
Kapoor, Tarun M.
Linked Authors
Person
Person
Person
Person
Person
Alternative Title
Citable URI
As Published
Date Created
Location
DOI
10.1091/mbc.E04-05-0440
Related Materials
Replaces
Replaced By
Keywords
Abstract
We investigated the mechanism by which meiotic spindles become bipolar and the correlation between bipolarity and poleward flux, using Xenopus egg extracts. By speckle microscopy and computational alignment, we find that monopolar sperm asters do not show evidence for flux, partially contradicting previous work. We account for the discrepancy by describing spontaneous bipolarization of sperm asters that was missed previously. During spontaneous bipolarization, onset of flux correlated with onset of bipolarity, implying that antiparallel microtubule organization may be required for flux. Using a probe for TPX2 in addition to tubulin, we describe two pathways that lead to spontaneous bipolarization, new pole assembly near chromatin, and pole splitting. By inhibiting the Ran pathway with excess importin-alpha, we establish a role for chromatin-derived, antiparallel overlap bundles in generating the sliding force for flux, and we examine these bundles by electron microscopy. Our results highlight the importance of two processes, chromatin-initiated microtubule nucleation, and sliding forces generated between antiparallel microtubules, in self-organization of spindle bipolarity and poleward flux.
Description
Author Posting. © American Society for Cell Biology, 2004. This article is posted here by permission of American Society for Cell Biology for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Molecular Biology of the Cell 15 (2004): 5603-5615, doi:10.1091/mbc.E04-05-0440.
Embargo Date
Citation
Molecular Biology of the Cell 15 (2004): 5603-5615